By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
PHOENIX -- The state Court of Appeals has refused to reinstate the indictment against 11 fake electors and others who Attorney General Kris Mayes contends were part of a scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential race.
In a brief order Monday, Presiding Judge Kent Cattani said he and two of his colleagues considered the request by Mayes to overturn a trial court ruling that grand jurors were not given all the information they needed before they handed up the indictments. But he said the trio decided not to step in.
The decision, unless overturned by the Arizona Supreme Court, would mean that Mayes would need to start all over again and present her case that there is sufficient evidence to charge all of them with fraud, conspiracy and forgery in connection with signing and submitting documents to federal officials and Congress that Donald Trump had won the popular vote in Arizona and was entitled to the state's 11 electoral votes. The official tally, however, shows that Joe Biden won the state by 10,457 votes.
A spokesman for the Attorney General's Office said no decision had been made on whether to appeal.
But the Arizona Republican Party, citing the appellate ruling, already is calling on Mayes to drop "this politically motivated case.'' Gina Swoboda who chairs the state GOP, said the Democratic attorney general should "stop wasting time and taxpayer resources on partisan lawfare,'' noting the charges go back to what the defendants are accused of doing in 2020.
"Five years later, Kris Mayes is still fixated on 2020 while violent crime, fentanyl trafficking, and border chaos threaten our communities every single day,'' Swoboda said in a prepared statement. "This obsession is not justice -- it's politics.''
And Swoboda pointed out that similar cases filed in other states have faltered.
Earlier this month a judge in Michigan said prosecutors there had failed to show that the 16 people who signed paperwork in 2020 declaring that Trump had won the electoral votes intended to commit fraud. And without that intent, the judge said, the case brought by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel falls apart.
That question of intent is critical here in Arizona.
In May, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Sam Myers said the case needs to be sent back to the grand jury. He said grand jurors were not given access to the Electoral Count Act of 1887 and did not have that federal law explained to them before they found probable cause to indict those here.
What makes that significant is that federal law specifically addresses the possibility of competing presidential electors from a state and how Congress must handle them.
And that goes to the heart of the defense, both here and in Michigan: the claim tby defendants hat they were not trying to commit fraud but that they were preparing an "alternate slate'' of electors to send to Washington if it turned out that Trump actually outpolled Joe Biden. And there was, at the time, pending litigation over the election results.
It is impossible to know at this point whether providing that information to the grand jurors would have made any difference in their decision to indict the electors and others involved in the plan.
But Myers said the jurors were entitled to that information. And since they did not get it, the indictment is flawed.
In seeking to overturn Myers' decision -- and resurrect the indictment -- prosecutors argued the state has no duty to instruct grand jurors on laws that are not part of the elements of the offense or might provide them legal justification for their acts.
They also said the failure to read the 1887 law to grand jurors in any way legally prejudiced the defendants. And anyway, they said the state provide the grand jury "the substance of text of the relevant portions'' of that law.
Myers, however, wasn't buying it.
The judge said that law was discussed during the presentation of the case to the grand jury, and the jury did ask a witness for the state about the requirements of the law.
But where the prosecutors erred, he said, was failing to give the grand jurors the actual texts of the law before they returned indictments charges all with conspiracy, forgery, and conducting fraudulent schemes and practices in connection with the 2020 election.
"A prosecutor has a duty to instruct the grand jury on all the law applicable to the facts of the case,'' Myers wrote. And he said that includes instructing the jurors on "justification defenses'' that, based on the evidence provided, are relevant to the jurors determining whether there is probable cause to believe they have committed a crime.
"Due process compels the prosecutor to make a fair and impartial presentation to the grand jury,'' Myers said. And he said that is true even if the jurors do not make any specific request for additional legal instruction.
The indictment charges 18 people with being part of a scheme to "prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency of the United States, keeping President Donald J. Trump in office against the will of Arizona voters, and depriving Arizona voters of their right to vote and have their votes counted.''
The most visible part of that plot, at least in Arizona, was 11 Republicans signing a document claiming that Trump had won the popular vote here and that they represented the state's 11 electoral votes to be cast for him. That list includes two then-current state senators -- Jake Hoffman of Queen Creek who is still in the Legislature and Anthony Kern of Glendale who is not but is now seeking reelection -- as well as Kelli Ward who at the time was the chair of the Arizona Republican Party, and her husband Michael.
The defendants have said they did nothing wrong and simply prepared the documents in case litigation would show that Trump actually won. But the indictment says the actions here -- and similar ones in other states -- were part of a larger plan to deny Biden the necessary 270 electoral votes he needed, throwing the decision on the race to Congress.
Charges also were brought in Arizona against others in the Trump orbit, including former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and several of Trump's attorneys including John Eastman, Christian Bobb and Rudy Giuliani. Another Trump attorney, Jenna Ellis, is having the charges against her dismissed after she agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.
Trump himself was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator.
--
On X, Bluesky, and Threads: @azcapmedia