Attorney General Kris Mayes is dropping her legal fight to require parents of children who get vouchers to document each time how their purchases of items are truly educational.
In a new agreement, Mayes has agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by the Goldwater Institute which challenged her position that individual "supplemental'' items bought by parents must be listed as required or recommended in a specific curriculum document before they can get reimbursed. The challengers said that mandate, which had been implemented by the Department of Education at her direction, created unnecessary -- and they argued, illegal -- hurdles for items as simple as books and pencils. But the agreement does not create carte blanche for voucher parents -- mainly of home-schooled children -- to now just go out and buy what they want.
As part of the deal, the state Department of Education has agreed to a scaled-back system. It will require parents requesting reimbursement from what is formally known as the Empowerment Scholarship Account program to detail the kind of courses for which their students need these items.
Potentially more significant, they also will have to attest that the items are "intended to support a curriculum or course of study'' for the students "and are not being purchased for any other purpose.'' And that attestation also will have a warning that providing false information can lead to suspension or total loss of voucher funds.
Mayes' spokesman, Richie Taylor, said his boss still believes that all purchases of items that are not clearly for educational purposes only must be examined -- and preapproved -- by the Department of Education.
"We believe that this was important so that the money being spent for taxpayer dollars had documentation to prove that it was tied to a curriculum and general educational needs,'' he said.
And in legal briefs, the Attorney General's Office said that the alternative of simply allowing automatic reimbursement based on a claim that an item was "educational'' is unacceptable.
"This would result in the state buying items that a family might like to have -- e.g. pianos, telescopes, passes to trampoline gyms, or expensive gardening or kitchen equipment -- that have no discerning connection to their child's education,'' lawyers for the state told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Rodrick Coffey.
And Taylor said there are reasons to take that position. "The facts of the ESA program and the reports of misspending on things that are clearly not educational have been borne out,'' he said. Still, he said, lawyers from his office involved with the case decided that the compromise -- requiring parents to actually link their requests for reimbursements to a specific course or curriculum item -- made settling the case the better course of action than pursuing their claims. And there also is the fact that Coffey had already rejected the AG's bid to have the lawsuit tossed, even before a trial.
"Appealing this to another court wasn't the best use of the state's resources,'' Taylor said.
But there's also something else at play. Taylor pointed out that education groups have filed the paperwork to put a measure on the November ballot to make major changes to the ESA program.
Some of what is in the initiative are unrelated to this issue, like a cap on family income to be able to get the $7,500 vouchers. But the measure, if approved, contains not just a list of items that cannot be purchased with ESA dollars but also an explicit requirement for the Department of Education to approve only purchases that are "directly and substantially related to curricular content and used to teach or enhance an approved curriculum.''
"Voters are going to decide this,'' said Taylor.
Jon Riches, general counsel of the Goldwater Institute, said the settlement of the lawsuit his organization brought proves the merits of its claim.
"The big issue was that the state was demanding curriculum documentation that state law doesn't authorize and that the ESA Handbook and ESA rules certainly don't authorize,'' he said.
Riches said that, from his perspective, the settlement is a victory. And he said that the new obligation on parents -- the checkbox to say what courses the materials are being bought and the attestation that the items are required -- are much better than what the Department of Education had been requiring.
"That's a much different requirement, that's a much different demand than actually having parents go back and create curricula from whole cloth to justify buying Brown Bear, Brown Bear (a children's book to help toddlers learn colors and animals) or a box of pencils,'' he said.
Part of what made the case unusual is that state schools chief Tom Horne, who heads the Department of Education, originally started out as a defendant in the case filed by the Goldwater Institute.
But as the case progressed, Horne took the position that the challengers were correct. And that actually made him a plaintiff in the case against Mayes.
"It's a stupid burden when somebody buys pencils to make them tie them to a curriculum,'' he said.
"It doesn't make any sense at all,'' Horne said. "We're talking about standard educational materials. We're not talking about negligees or diamond rings.''
Those are not just random examples.
KPNX-TV, the NBC news affiliate in Phoenix, found that the Department of Education had approved exactly those kinds of purchases with ESA funds. That occurred because the agency, unable to preapprove each purchase, had instituted a "risk-based auditing system'' where there was automatic reimbursement of items of less than $2,000, subject to subsequent review by the agency and possible demands for reimbursement if unjustified.
The agreement comes against the backdrop of the initiative filed by the Arizona Education Association and Save Our Schools Arizona asking voters to enact major changes to the voucher system. It also comes as the program has gone meteoric growth.
First approved in 2011, it was designed largely for students with special needs who could not get the services they needed in the public school system. It was subsequently expanded in steps to include foster children, children from military families, those living on reservations, and those attending schools rated D or F.
But the big change came in 2022 when lawmakers made vouchers available for all students. That expanded the program from 12,000 students that year to now more than 100,000, with a price tag exceeding $1 billion.
That, in turn, led to some of the issues about purchases made, largely by parents who were home schooling instead of using their ESA dollars to send their children to private or parochial schools.
